Was there anythingJimmy Stewartcouldn’t do? Before the 1950s, Stewart’s presence in a film evoked a sense of safety;here was someone who almost always played a good man. Flawed ones, certainly, but they were ultimately stalwart in their convictions. Idealized as a pillar of societal morality thanks toMr. Smith Goes to Washington,It’s a Wonderful Life,andHarvey, the ’50s saw the already mythical Stewart deliver radically different contributions to the cinema landscape. He found a niche within theWestern genre, whichallowed him to broaden his cultural imagewith roles thatoozed moral ambiguity.
In this regard, his Westerns andAlfred Hitchcock’sperverse masterpieceVertigotend to steal the spotlight where Stewart’s more notorious characters are concerned. Yet directorOtto Preminger’sAnatomy of a Murder,released one year afterVertigo, is just as deserving of praise.Stewart brings a cornucopia of layersto defense attorney Paul Biegler, who emerges from semi-retirement to tackle a complicated case that lights a fire in his razor-sharp mind.Biegler isn’t passionately pursuing justice like the characters emblematic of Stewart’s youth, nor is he an outright villain who knows his way around a rifle. Biegler just likes a challenge.
Anatomy of a Murder
An upstate Michigan lawyer defends a soldier who claims he killed an innkeeper due to temporary insanity after the victim raped his wife. What is the truth, and will he win his case?
What Is Jimmy Stewart’s ‘Anatomy of a Murder’ About?
Film historians and law practitioners considerAnatomy of a Murderone of thefinest and most accurate courtroom dramas. Based on the 1958 novel of the same name byJohn D. Voelker(pen name Robert Traver), a former Michigan Supreme Court Justice, andinspired by a real-life caseVoelker oversaw, James Stewart’s Paul Biegler is a Michigan lawyer who lost his reelection campaign for district attorney. Now, he leads a seemingly idyllic existence drinking whiskey, playing the piano, and fishing. (Biegler is based in part on Voelker, who, by 1952, was “a reluctant defense lawyer after losing a seventh bid for reelection in 1950, preferring to pursue a long list of hobbies that included fishing for trout, playing cribbage with pals and writing.")
When Laura Manion (Lee Remick) asks Biegler to represent her husband Frederick (Ben Gazzara), an army lieutenantcharged with murder, Biegler isn’t interested. He’s content to handle the occasional divorce case and finds Frederick Manion “insolent and hostile,” which is the slam-dunk truth.Manion demonstrates no remorse for killing Barney Quillin retribution for Quill raping his wife. He just wants to avoid prison and shirk moral responsibility. Biegler’s only tempted when his best friend and fellow former lawyer Parnell McCarthy (Arthur O’Connell) frames the case as a puzzle for Biegler to solve. Biegler loves practicing law so much that he reads Supreme Court reports for fun, and he admits to missing the things most employees detest: detailed research, late nights, and old, dusty offices.
In short, he’s a nerd. He’s also a man well acquainted with the world’s intrinsic corruption. As a lawyer, he learned that people are multifaceted and can’t be easily delineated into just “good or bad.” This characteristic also parallels John D. Voelker, who “had always been captivated by the moral ambiguities of the law – and of life.” With that in mind,Jimmy Stewart rests the pendulum of Biegler’s virtuesomewhere nebulous that’s neither nefarious nor upstanding — which makes for a more engaging, subversive character. The regal decency anddefiant integrity Stewart so often displayedin prior roles are gone. Biegler doesn’t embark on a quest for the truth or believe he’s helping an innocent man escape incarceration.Determining how to win an otherwise unwinnable case motivates and delights him.
Jimmy Stewart Plays Against Type in ‘Anatomy of a Murder’
Jimmy Stewart conveys this calculated intelligencewith a sneaky underhandedness that’s as brilliant as it is mildly uncomfortable. He puts Manion to the test before deciding to take his case, explaining that since there are witnesses to Manion’s murder of Quill, Manion needs to provide a “legal excuse, not [a] justification” for his actions. He plants the seed of thought in Manion’s mind and patiently waits for Manion’s response, smoking a cigar in silence. He observes Manion with glittering eyes, peeling away the other man’s layers with experienced astuteness. He smirks,sly but palpably satisfied, when Manion demonstrates restraint and intelligence. Ultimately, Manion says he was seized by “irresistible impulse,” an alternate term for the temporary insanity defense and an obvious lie (and words taken straight from Voelker’s case). Biegler agrees to defend him because that’s new and interesting.
This tense, surprising exchange between Biegler and Manion relies on the art of subtlety and non-verbal performance, of which Stewart is an accomplished maestro. It also counts as witness coaching, which is against the law. Yet Stewart doesn’t play Biegler as malicious; just intrigued, and driven. Biegler dives into historical documents with glee, andStewart displays a recognizably boyish excitementwhen he discovers a legal precedent for temporary insanity.The subtleties of the law captivate Biegler, but not necessarily the proper execution of said subtleties. Earlier in the film, McCarthy teasingly wondered if Biegler was “too pure…for the natural impurities of the law.” Clearly, Biegler has no qualms about testing the law’s durability despite his love for its intricacies.
Jimmy Stewart Turns His Charm Into a Weapon
Jimmy Stewart alsoinfuses Biegler with humor: cracking jokes in the courtroom, delivering questions with a sly smirk, and objecting with increasingly passionate anger. Every move he makes is intentional: he’s as duplicitous as he is determined, using his “aw shucks”Jimmy Stewart drawl and country-boy demeanorto win over the witnesses, the judge (Joseph N. Welch), and the courtroom spectators.He’s argumentative, performative, mocking, witty, and disarming all in one. Biegler knows how to implant thoughts in the jury’s minds: he weaves his words into webs that bend them to his favor.
The Western That Broke Up Jimmy Stewart and Anthony Mann’s Working Relationship
Disagreements over the Western sparked a rift between the two, leading to the bitter end of their collaboration.
The prosecuting attorneys (Brooks WestandGeorge C. Scott, the latter delivering an extraordinary and Oscar-nominated performance) call him irresponsible and outrageous, and initially dismiss him as a fool. But Biegler knows how to sneak around the justice system through guile. For every moment he’s shouting like a cannonball, he’s making the spectators shriek with laughter. He knows exactly when to chuck a wry glance over his shoulder and when to intimidate a witness by looming into their personal space. He even manipulates the judge so subtly, it’s almost invisible.Biegler turns the trial into an entertaining theatrical presentationin the name of winning this particular case. The courtroom is a chess match and Biegler the chess master.
Jimmy Stewart Brings Nuance to ‘Anatomy of a Murder'
Intentionally or not,Jimmy Stewart subverts his public reputationby infusing Biegler’s antics with an intensity reminiscent ofMr. Smith Goes to Washington— exceptthe speeches inAnatomy of a Murderare matured, refined, and sometimes sour. After all, Biegler knows that people are complicated and seems to have comfortably resolved himself to that fact.
Many moments reinforce Biegler’s complex nature. He isn’t anything close to cruel, selfish, or amoral in his daily life. He frets about McCarthy’s safety because his best friend is an alcoholic. Biegler’s complimentary to and snarky with his secretary Maida (Eve Arden), gentle with Quill’s daughter Mary Pilant (Kathryn Grant), and patiently empathetic to Laura Manion. Given his penchant for easy manipulation and how every decision affects the strength of his case, how genuine those latter two interactions are is up in the air. But this is Jimmy Stewart; the need to win his case can co-exist alongsidethe genuinely kind personalityBiegler demonstrated at the film’s start.
In contrast to other law classics like12 Angry Men,Anatomy of a Murderpaints a portrait where cleverness triumphs over truth, justice, andthe so-called American way. Morality is messy whether you’re a layperson or a lawyer: both the prosecutors and Biegler bend the rules in their respective attempts to win, and witnesses withhold information. Rather than indulge in an understandable fantasy about good prevailing at all costs,Anatomyreflects the judicial system’s unavoidable fallibility. The truth differs from person to person according to their own experiences and social biases. There are no clear answers, and there don’t need to be.Anatomyis one of the best courtroom dramasin no small part due to Stewart operating at the top of his game in a film that, while critically praised and preserved by the US Film Registry,feels like it slips through the cracks when it comes to the amorphous, slippery intelligence of its leading man’s performance.
Anatomy of a Murderis available to rent on Prime Video in the U.S.
